|  Dutch 
        Civil Code
  Book 6 The law of obligations   Title 6.1 Obligations in general
 Section 6.1.9 Effects of a non-performance
 Subsection 6.1.9.1 General provisions
 Article 6:74 Requirements for a compensation for damages
 - 1. Every imperfection in the compliance with 
        an obligation is a non-performance of the debtor and makes him liable 
        for the damage which the creditor suffers as a result, unless the non-performance 
        is not attributable to the debtor.
 - 2. As far as it is not yet permanently impossible to accomplish the 
        indebted performance, paragraph 1 of this Article only applies with due 
        observance of what is regulated in Subsection 2 for a debtor who is in 
        default.
 Article 6:75 Legal excuse for a non-performance (force 
        majeure)
 A non-performance cannot be attributed to the debtor if he is not to blame 
        for it nor accountable for it by virtue of law, a juridical act or generally 
        accepted principles (common opinion).
 Article 6:76 Liability for auxiliary persons
 Where, in the performance of an obligation, the debtor makes use of the 
        assistance of other persons, he is liable (responsible) for their behaviour 
        in the same way as if he would have behaved himself as such.
 Article 6:77 Liability for auxiliary equipment
 Where, in the performance of an obligation, a thing is used that appears 
        to be unfit for that purpose, the non-performance which might result from 
        this, is attributable to the debtor, unless this would be unreasonable 
        in view of the content and necessary implication of the juridical act 
        from which the obligation arises, the generally accepted principles (common 
        opinion) and other circumstances of the situation.
 Article 6:78 Compensation for damages in case of a 
        legal excuse (force majeure)
 - 1. As far as the debtor has enjoyed a benefit from a not attributable 
        non-performance, which benefit he would not have enjoyed if he would have 
        performed in conformity with his obligation, he has to undo, in accordance 
        with the rules for an unjustified enrichment, the damage that the creditor 
        has suffered from his non-performance.
 - 2. When this benefit is a  debt-claim of the debtor against a 
        third party [insurance company or other liable person], then the debtor 
        may comply with the previous paragraph through a transfer of that debt-claim 
        to the creditor.
 Article 6:79 Seizure and setoff in case of a legal 
        excuse
 Where the debtor was not able to comply with his obligation due to a cause 
        not attributable to him (legal excuse), but the creditor is nevertheless 
        capable of obtaining the indebted performance through a seizure, a foreclosure 
        without recourse to the court or a setoff, the creditor has the right 
        to do so.
 Article 6:80 Legal effects of a non-performance before 
        the debt-claim is due and demandable
 - 1. The legal effects of a non-performance set in even before the  
        debt-claim of the creditor has become due and demandable:
 a. if it is certain that it will be impossible 
        for the debtor to perform without an imperfection;
 b. if the creditor must conclude from a statement 
        of the debtor that he will not perform in conformity with his obligation;
 c. or if the creditor has good reasons to fear 
        that the debtor will not perform in conformity with his obligation and 
        the debtor does not comply with a written notification of the creditor 
        in which the debtor is asked to confirm, within a reasonable time, that 
        he is willing to perform in conformity with his obligation at the moment 
        on which his obligation will become due and demandable. The grounds that 
        gave the creditor good reasons to fear for a non-performance of the debtor 
        must be mentioned in this notification too.
 - 2. The original day on which the debt-claim will become due and demandable 
        continues to apply to the obligation to pay for damages which results 
        from the delay and from the attribution of the non-performance to the 
        debtor with regard to the time as of which he is in default.
 Subsection 6.1.9.2 Default of the 
        debtor
 Article 6:81 Default
 The debtor is in default during the time that the performance is not carried 
        out in conformity with the obligation after it has become due and demandable, 
        provided that the requirements of Article 6:82 and 6:83 are met, except 
        as far as the delay cannot be attributed to him or it has become permanently 
        impossible to perform the obligation.
 Article 6:82 Letter of formal notice of default
 - 1. The debtor is in default when he is held liable for his non-performance 
        by a letter of formal notice, in which the creditor grants him a reasonable 
        period of time during which he still may perform in conformity with his 
        obligation, and he nevertheless fails to accomplish the indebted performance 
        within that period.
 - 2. If the debtor is temporarily unable to comply with his obligation 
        or if it has become clear from his attitude that it will be useless to 
        grant him a reasonable period of time in order to perform after all, then 
        he may be held liable solely by a written announcement from which follows 
        that he will be held responsible for his non-performance.
 Article 6:83 Default without a letter of formal notice 
        to perform or an alternative announcement
 The debtor defaults [gets in default] immediately, without the necessity 
        of a prior letter of formal notice to perform or an announcement in which 
        he is held responsible for his non-performance:
 a. when the obligation is subject to a time 
        stipulation (expiry date) and he has failed to accomplish the indebted 
        performance within the specified period, except when this time stipulation 
        has another meaning.
 b. when the obligation results from tort or 
        when it forces the debtor to pay for damages as meant in Article 6:74 
        paragraph 1, and the indebted obligation is not performed instantly;
 c. when the creditor must conclude from a statement 
        of the debtor that he will not perform in conformity with his obligation.
 Article 6:84 Impossibility to perform during the time 
        the debtor is in default
 When the debtor is in default, every occurring event that makes it impossible 
        for him to perform in conformity with his obligation and that is not attributable 
        to the creditor, will be attributable to the debtor; the debtor has to 
        compensate the damage that has been caused as a result, unless de creditor 
        would have suffered this damage also when the obligation would have been 
        performed properly and in time.
 Article 6:85 Compensation for damage caused by a delay
 Damage resulting from a delay in the performance of the obligation only 
        has to be compensated by the debtor over the time that he is in default.
 Article 6:86 Purgation
 During the time that the debtor is in default, the creditor may refuse 
        an offer of the debtor to perform the obligation so long as the debtor 
        does not also offer to pay for damages and costs that already have become 
        indebted as a result of the non-performance.
 Article 6:87 Alternative compensation for damages
 - 1. When the debtor is in default and the creditor has notified him in 
        writing that he demands the payment of damages instead of the original 
        performance, the non-performed obligation is converted into an obligation 
        to pay for alternative damages, unless it already was (or had become) 
        permanently impossible to accomplish the original performance.
 - 2. The original obligation shall not be converted in an obligation to 
        pay for alternative damages when this is not justified in view of the 
        fact that the non-performance is of minor importance.
 Subsection 6.1.9.3 Further impact 
        of a on-performance
 Article 6:88 Loss of rights for the creditor after 
        the expiration of a response period set for this purpose by the debtor
 - 1. The debtor who has failed to comply with his obligation, may set 
        a reasonable time period to the creditor within which the creditor must 
        notify him which of the applicable legal remedies the creditor will use 
        against him, under the consequence that, if this period expires without 
        such notification, the creditor will only be able:
 a. to demand a payment for damages which are 
        indebted by law in case of the non-performance and, as far as the obligation 
        commits the debtor to pay a sum of money, the payment of that sum of money;
 b. to rescind the agreement from which the 
        obligation results, if the debtor claims that the non-performance is not 
        attributable to him.
 - 2. Where the creditor has indicated, within the reasonable period set 
        to him by the debtor, that he demands performance of the original obligation, 
        but the debtor fails to comply with this demand within a reasonable time, 
        the creditor may again use all applicable legal remedies; in that event 
        the previous paragraph applies accordingly.
 Article 6:89 Loss of all rights when the creditor 
        hasn’t complained timely
 The creditor cannot appeal to an imperfection (fault) in the received 
        performance if he has not with convenient speed complained about it to 
        the debtor after he has discovered that imperfection (fault) or after 
        he reasonably should have discovered it.
 Article 6:90 Right of cash sale
 - 1. When the debtor has to deliver (supply) goods that decline easily 
        or that rapidly become useless or that can only be preserved with such 
        difficulties that in the circumstances this cannot be expected of the 
        debtor, then the debtor is entitled to sell these goods in a proper way. 
        The debtor is towards the creditor obliged to proceed to such a sale when 
        this is unmistakably required in view of the interests of the creditor 
        or when the creditor has told him to sell the goods.
 - 2. The net proceeds of this sale replace (take the place of) the goods 
        which should have been delivered (supplied) originally, without prejudice 
        to the rights of the creditor that result from the debtor’s non-performance.
 Subsection 6.1.9.4 Contractual 
        penalties
 Article 6:91 Contractual penalty clause
 A contractual penalty clause is every contractual provision stipulating 
        that the debtor, if he fails to perform his obligation correctly, has 
        to pay a sum of money or deliver another performance, regardless if this 
        sum of money or other performance is meant to be a compensation for damages 
        or just an incentive to perform the obligation.
 Article 6:92 Appeal to the performance of a contractual 
        penalty clause
 - 1. The creditor cannot demand performance of both, the contractual penalty 
        clause and the obligation to which this penalty clause is linked.
 - 2. What is indebted on the basis of a contractual penalty clause will 
        replace (take the place of) the compensation for damages that would have 
        been due by virtue of law (statutory provisions).
 - 3. The creditor cannot demand performance of the contractual penalty 
        clause when the non-performance of the obligation to which that clause 
        is linked is not attributable to the debtor.
 Article 6:93 Requirements for claiming the contractual 
        penalty
 In order to be able to demand the performance of a contractual penalty, 
        the creditor must have in vain warned the debtor to perform his obligation 
        by a letter of formal notice or an announcement as far as this would have 
        been necessary in order to be able to demand the compensation for damages 
        due by virtue of law (statutory provisions).
 Article 6:94 A reduction or increase of the contractual 
        penalty
 - 1. The court may, upon the request of the 
        debtor, reduce the contractual penalty if this is obliviously required 
        by standards of reasonableness and fairness, on the understanding that 
        it cannot grant the creditor less than the applying compensation for damages 
        that would have been due by virtue of law (statutory provisions).
 - 2. The court may, upon the request of the 
        creditor, grant a compensation for additional damages in addition to a 
        contractual penalty which has replaced the compensation for damages that 
        would have been due by virtue of law (statutory provisions), if this is 
        obliviously required by standards of reasonableness and fairness.
 - 3. Every contractual provision in derogation 
        from paragraph 1 is null and void.
                                                         
 |